 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |

On May 21, 2010, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) released its long-awaited recommendations resulting from the miraculous ditching of US Airways Flight 1549 in the Hudson River after total engine failure from ingesting geese shortly after taking off from LaGuardia Airport in New York. One of the 25 recommendations could have direct implications for Part 139 certificated airports. The NTSB recommended that the Federal Aviation Administration:
"Require all Part 139-certificated airports to conduct wildlife hazard assessments (WHA) to proactively assess the likelihood of wildlife strikes, and, if the WHA indicates the need for a wildlife hazard management plan then require the airport to implement such a plan into its airport certification manual."
NTSB’s recommendation represents a significant change from the FAA’s previous policy regarding the need for an airport to conduct a wildlife hazard assessment, which was predicated on actual reported bird strikes having occurred at an airport. The NTSB’s recommendation is clearly aimed at preventing bird strikes before they occur rather than trying to mitigate an already present bird strike problem.
While the FAA has yet to act on the NTSB’s recommendation, Part 139 airport operators are already faced with a dilemma: to wait until the FAA acts on the NTSB’s recommendation or to undertake a wildlife hazard assessment to possibly prevent Flight 1549 type incident from happening at their airport.
ESA Airports is prepared to help airports with this issue. Our FAA-qualified wildlife hazard biologist, Sarah Brammell, is prepared to conduct a wildlife hazard assessment and, if needed, to develop a wildlife hazard management plan or to provide advice and guidance on wildlife hazard potential to help airports make these challenging decisions.
Have a question about the best path to follow? Feel free to contact Sarah at sbrammell@esassoc.com or call her at (813) 207-7200.
While the struggling US economy continues to affect aircraft operations at existing airports across the country, making forecasting future activity challenging at best, imagine trying to develop forecast for a general aviation (GA) airport that does not yet have any operations. ESA Airports was asked to do just this when retained by the March Joint Powers Authority (JPA) to develop a GA aircraft operations forecast for the March Inland Airport; the civilian side of the joint use March Air Reserve Base (RIV) in Riverside, California. ESA Airports' Mike Arnold who led the forecasting effort said “GA aircraft activity is closely tied to population and economic growth, which the Inland Empire had seen quite a bit of until the economy started to falter a couple of years ago.” Despite the economic downtown, it quickly became clear that March Inland Airport would attract a portion of the region’s GA activity provided that the facilities (e.g., apron, hangars, fueling, etc.) to support GA aircraft operations were available on the March JPA’s portion of RIV. Obtaining federal and state environmental approval for the required GA facilities is currently underway with ESA Airports taking the lead on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation. “ESA Airports did a fantastic job documenting the demand for GA facilities at March Inland Airport at a time when most of the targets were moving,” said Gary Gosliga, Airport Director. Only time will tell as to how quickly GA activity at RIV takes off, but the ESA Airports forecast provides a sound basis for believing that there is a future for GA activity at March Inland Airport.
In the FAA’s 2009 National Wildlife Strike Database Analysis Report, a world renowned wildlife hazard mitigation expert states “According to data collected since 1990, the number of reported strikes has increased. Researchers are certain that several factors have contributed to that increase, including broader participation in the reporting process, increased numbers of hazardous species, a steady increase in air traffic, and a change in reporting statistics.” Did you know that ESA has been at the forefront of natural resource management and wildlife hazard projects at airports nationwide for the past 17 years and now has an FAA Qualified Wildlife Biologist on staff?
ESA Airports’ Sarah Brammell has become one of just a handful of professionals nationally that meet all four of the requirements to be considered an FAA Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist. Sarah holds an undergraduate degree in Biology, a Master’s Degree in Public Administration and Environmental Policy. She has managed wildlife hazard management programs at both FAR Part 139 and general aviation airports, conducted a Wildlife Hazard Assessment under a FAA Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist, and has completed FAA approved training.
Sarah has worked with clients including Southwest Florida International Airport, St. Petersburg – Clearwater International Airport, Pittsburgh International Airport, Palm Beach County North Park Airport, and Sacramento International Airport. Sarah will be attending and presenting at the 12th Annual Joint Meeting of the Bird Strike Committees USA/Canada on June 21-24, 2010 in Salt Lake City, Utah. Have a question about WHMPs or WHAs? Contact Sarah at sbrammell@esassoc.com.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|